VBAC in USA Today
Categories:
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: VBAC in USA Today.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://mt.stblogs.org/cgi/mt-tb.cgi/16005
4 Comments
Leave a comment
Categories
- Blog stuff (215)
- Food (49)
- Home and Garden (80)
- Midwifery (336)
- Miscellany (93)
- Religion (393)
- biomedical ethics (125)
- crossing the tiber (12)
- emma (62)
- faith in the desert (106)
- health and illness (91)
- humour (59)
- interviews (33)
- language (10)
- local news (4)
- marriage and family (69)
- memes (53)
- music and poesy (42)
- nancy's fight (16)
- personal (64)
- politics and culture (107)
- pope stuff (16)
Monthly Archives
- July 2008 (2)
- June 2008 (10)
- May 2008 (11)
- April 2008 (21)
- March 2008 (7)
- February 2008 (10)
- January 2008 (6)
- December 2007 (12)
- November 2007 (5)
- October 2007 (15)
- September 2007 (19)
- August 2007 (16)
- July 2007 (29)
- June 2007 (35)
- May 2007 (22)
- April 2007 (13)
- March 2007 (39)
- February 2007 (13)
- January 2007 (26)
- December 2006 (4)
- November 2006 (11)
- October 2006 (6)
- September 2006 (11)
- August 2006 (18)
- July 2006 (24)
- June 2006 (37)
- May 2006 (46)
- April 2006 (29)
- March 2006 (31)
- February 2006 (48)
- January 2006 (49)
- December 2005 (45)
- November 2005 (47)
- October 2005 (54)
- September 2005 (58)
- August 2005 (33)
- July 2005 (38)
- June 2005 (38)
- May 2005 (43)
- April 2005 (46)
- March 2005 (64)
- February 2005 (48)
- January 2005 (47)
- December 2004 (27)
- November 2004 (40)
- October 2004 (47)
- September 2004 (78)
- August 2004 (89)
- July 2004 (58)
- June 2004 (64)
- May 2004 (83)
- April 2004 (81)
- March 2004 (62)
- February 2004 (63)
- January 2004 (67)
- December 2003 (47)
- November 2003 (53)
- October 2003 (67)
- September 2003 (71)
- August 2003 (64)
- July 2003 (44)
- June 2003 (46)
- May 2003 (74)
- April 2003 (65)
- March 2003 (78)
- February 2003 (90)
- January 2003 (33)
Pages
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by published on August 25, 2005 11:40 AM.
sort of a blog was the previous entry in this blog.
abortion pill kills 4 women is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

This is simply a consequence of increased liability pressure in medicine. Limit the liability with tort reform and you get back options in your care.
Here's my favorite part of the article:
"Moving four hours from her family was out of the question, Roebuck says. So was scheduling a C-section. So, on June 29, Roebuck delivered 9-pound, 13-ounce Shane at home with only friends and family in attendance."
>>Uh, oh, crazy, nutty homebirthing! Don't you know that babies that big have to be cut out of you???
"The thought of laboring or delivering at home after a C-section, without electronic fetal monitoring and an operating room close by in case of a uterine rupture, sends chills down Bruce Flamm's spine.
"It sounds like it is kind of spreading, which is just a disaster," says Flamm, a Kaiser Permanente OB/GYN in Riverside, Calif., who has written extensively about VBACs."
>>Choosing a hbac because the doctors won't allow a normal birth in a hospital? That's a disaster? Shut up, Flamm...
"Roebuck was lucky; her home VBAC went smoothly, Flamm says. But it's only a matter of time before one goes wrong and a baby dies because a C-section could not be performed quickly enough, he says."
>>It's only a matter of time. Oh, births never ever go wrong in the hospital, do they? Sorry, I forgot that we women need to be saved from ourselves...
Flamm urges women to "search for the middle ground. Talk to the doctor, see if they would just be willing to stick around the hospital that one day they're in labor."
"Unfortunately," Flamm says, "nobody wants to do the middle ground."
>>Yeah, nobody, including the doctors. Why would a doctor want to stick around the hospital? And if they *do* stick around, aren't they then tempted to force the labor into Friedman's Curve, augmenting and then assisting delivery if deemed "necessary"? How is THAT less disastrous then planning a normal, unaugmented labor and birth at home???
:-)
>Oh, births never ever go wrong in the hospital, >do they? Sorry, I forgot that we women need to >be saved from ourselves...
Yeah, Valerie, I was thinking that regarding this quote:
>The VBAC rupture complication rate may seem >quite low, says Hankins, chief of obstetrics and >maternal-fetal medicine at the University of >Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, but "it's >damn high if you're the one."
Um, yeah, 7 out of 18,000!!! How many iatrogenic damages happen to babies in C-sections?
--Amanda
Wow, that article was really negative. Negative toward c-sections, negative toward lawyers, negative toward homebirth.
I liked how they tried to phrase it as a "choice" issue, though. But I guess choice and a woman's body being her own only has to do with a fetus you don't want, not for one you do want.