I wish I had a link for the full text

| | Comments (3)

A friend sent me this - I thought it very interesting.

Long-Term Physical and Psychological Health Consequences of Induced Abortion: Review of the Evidence
John M. Thorp, Jr.[*], MD, Katherine E. Hartmann, MD,PhD[**], and Elizabeth Shadigian, MD[***],

Induced abortion is a prevalent response to an unintended pregnancy. The long-term health consequences are poorly investigated and conclusions must be drawn from observational studies. Using strict inclusion criteria (study population >100 subjects, follow up >60 days) we reviewed an array of conditions in women's health.

Induced abortion was not associated with changes in the prevalence of subsequent subfertility, spontaneous abortion, or ectopic pregnancy. Previous abortion was a risk factor for placenta previa. Moreover, induced abortion increased the risks for both a subsequent preterm delivery and mood disorders substantial enough to provoke attempts of self-harm.

Preterm delivery and depression are important conditions in women's health and avoidance of induced abortion has potential as a strategy to reduce their prevalence. Only review articles including the single published meta-analysis exploring linkages between abortion and breast cancer were relied upon to draw conclusions. Reviewers were mixed on whether subsequent breast neoplasia can be linked to induced abortion, although the sole meta-analysis found a summary odds ratio of 1.2 [sic; should be 1.3].

Whatever the effect of induced abortion on breast cancer risk, a young woman with an unintended pregnancy clearly sacrifices the protective effect of a term delivery should she decide to abort and delay childbearing. That increase in risk can be quantified using the Gail Model. Thus, we conclude that informed consent before induced abortion should include information about the subsequent risk of preterm delivery and depression. Although it remains uncertain whether elective abortion increases subsequent breast cancer, it is clear that a decision to abort and delay pregnancy culminates in a loss of protection with the net effect being an increased risk. [end of abstract]

To get the full article, send your request to: John M. Thorp, Jr, MD, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY; 2003;58(1):67-79 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. CME REVIEW ARTICLE 2


If you wait long enough, the information comes online ;-)


Hi, I noticed you were talking about HIV/AIDS on this site. If you'd like to submit your page to SH Directory, please do ;-) (http://www.shdir.com)

Hi, I noticed you were talking about Breast Cancer on this site. If you'd like to submit your page to SH Directory, please do ;-) (http://www.shdir.com)

February 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28    
The WeatherPixie

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by alicia published on January 28, 2003 10:24 PM.

Mass Today was the previous entry in this blog.

Not from home is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.